Little Pink Feeds for You and Me:

At last count I’ve got 78 rss feeds (say what?) in my reader. It’s the only way I keep track of my favorite blogs and online publications without losing my head. Even then I still do sometimes.

However, because I view idiocy as a virtue, I still get angry when I discover my favorite web sites don’t have feeds. I usually then forget they exist for many months at a time 1) because there are too many of them and 2) I have the attention span of a firefly.

Feedapalooza is a new service that may be the answer. It creates custom rss feeds for any site you want for the very reasonable price of $2. $16-$20 seems a small price to avoid waiting for my favorite sites to come into the 21st century, year five, month 7. For me, when it comes to information consumption, the future is now. Now count to ten.

The future is now past. Hurry! Catch up!

UPDATE: How’s this for fast? Eric Rice reports that the New York Times does have rss feeds. Hot damn!

iSuppose:

Thanks to some seriously fierce curating from my buddy George, I’m now familiar with the possibilities behind apple’s new iTunes feature, iMix. Ostensibly it allows you create a mix from iTunes’s music library and let your friends know about it.

Neat idea. Here are a few ways it could be better…

1. Search Functionality: I only know about George’s mixes because he told me. Shouldn’t I be able to go to iMix, type in someone’s user name and see their mixes, just like I can see their Wish List on Amazon?

2. The 30 second rule. How about letting people hear songs on iMixes in their entirety and then limiting the number of times you can play before you by? 15 30-second fragments does not a mix make.

3. My iMixes. The home page of iMix is either a set of the most top rated mixes or the most recently added, both of which are useless pieces of information. The essence of a mix isn’t what’s on it but who gives it to you. A mix from a stranger is just a random collection of songs. So how about my own page with my mixes and links to my friends and theirs? A little social software action up in this piece?

Or maybe that’s where they are headed…

Grateful Glacial:

The fine folk behind Interglacial.com have taken it upon themselves to provide RSS Feeds for sites that haven’t gotten around to doing it themselves. Thus, I now can get the goods from ALDaily and Molly Ivins. Rock on!

I wonder if they take requests? Whom do you think is missing an RSS feed and needs one?

Kinja Unpacked:

The fact that I didn’t understand Kinja as an Alpha tester is not surprising because I don’t understand any web geegaw the first time around. Or the fifth. By then my patience is drained and I call upon friends to explain it to me in plain English. I give up easily.

This was the case with Blogger, with Flickr, with rss readers which I thought Kinja was until I saw this post from Jason Kottke and this one from Tom Coates, whom I’ve never met but I’m inviting into my Expert Barn.

I originially saw Kinja as my Great Web Hope, the answer to keeping track of the mess of blogs I like to read but A) forget they exist B) get so sick of clicking and typing URL’s that I give up by the letter “B” C) would like to pick and choose which posts I read but some interest me and some don’t. My friend Dan explained to me that NetNewsWire does all of these things just fine. He’s right. And as soon as every site I like has an RSS feed and I get used to reading them in that abreviated/no graphic form, it’ll be all I need.

I thought Kinja would be a kind of souped up reader, all of these things in a nifty web interface, as neat and compact as the Megnut mojo behind it.

I was wrong. Kinja is too feature-weak to be a tool for the experienced reader. You can’t create seperate lists for weblogs of different subjects, you can’t choose which order you’d like to read your list, you can’t view a master list of suggested sites on certain topics. It’s basically like a tickertape of your blog universe and useful for just about that amount of time.

However, Jason and Tom have imagined Kinja as a kind of web vouyerism, a way to peek in on other blogger’s browsing habits that they might not include in their blogroll. Jason has included a mark next to the links in his blogroll which have Kinja digests. Take this a step further and you’ve got Friendster For Wlogrolls, where reading lists can be swapped and shared as easily as an Itunes playlist.

This I get.

You April Fool, you.

For your April Fool’s Day merriment:

*The History of April Fool’s Day. Why am I not surprised that scholared believe it began in France, a country founded on making others feel stupid?

*A very long list of web-related April Fool’s Day silliness.

*Kinja, the blog-reader application funded by Nick Denton that my friend Meg has been heading up has launched in beta. This is not a joke. The New York Times, the world’s most humorless publication wrote something about it. Meg also announced that she’s leaving the project at the end of this month. No kidding here.

*Joshua Davis’s annual peek-under-the-hood of the history of his website Praystation. His cover art only includes 1998-2000. What happened to the rest?

*The annual St. Stupid’s Day Parade right here in San Francisco. My home.

10 Things I Learned at SXSW 2004

1. The Next Big Thing will Happen Here. I’m not the first one to say it since pretty obvious. New York bloggers are getting their shirts in knots about whether there is an A-List Cabal of Bloggers or whether Blogging is a Movement. Attendees of SXSW had this debate in 1999. The discussion has shifted to how personal publishing will interact with the world at large instead of simply with itself. The cross-currents of Social Software, Multi-Platform Content and Aggregation, File Sharing and Political Activism are about to collide. No one’s quite sure how it will play out but I want to be at the center of that whirpool (SXSW 2008?) when it does.

2. Growth can be both emotional and intellectual. I didn’t learn much at this year’s conference that I didn’t already know. I didn’t do as much frenetic theorizing about the future as I’ve done in year’s past. I felt let down at first but now I’m ok with it. Its my fifth year at SXSW, my third actively following technology trends. I don’t get as wowed as easily and thus spent more of this year reflecting, on my role in this conference and amongst the friends I’ve made here, on how I want the Internet to be part of my life in the archaic mills of literature production and how much I’ve changed since I started attending in 1998. This wasn’t the year I spotted the Next Big Thing and babbled about it incessantly. This was the year I grew up.

3. I like tradition. While I more than appreciate Mr. McNally’s brilliant assessment of conference crowds as “Dumb Mobs”, led about by spontaneous bursts of enthusiam, I also love the ritual of it all. I spent much of the week with the same core of people, whom I only see once a year. I have to take them to the Castle Hill Cafe, to Magnolia after Fray Cafe. It wouldn’t feel quite like the last night of the conference without Bruce Sterling’s house party followed by a 3 A.M. nosh at Katz’s Deli, followed by the walk home in the fog of morning.

4. As Mr. Wasilyk put it, “This year is notable by who isn’t here.”. True. Many from the earliest class of SXSW were not in attendence either by choice or unforseen circumstance. I don’t know quite what to make of this. I missed them. I hope they still see value in coming to the conference. But if they are ready to move on, that’s probably ok too. Mostly it says that the conference is growing up and changing, which is never easy but always necessary.

5. I’m a veteran now and its no big deal. Nikolai Nolan, whose been coming to this conference longer than just about anyone and should be named Official SXSW Historian after accomplishing this remarked “Kevin, you just showed up one year and now you’re a star.” If he means that I speak on panels and organize group activities then I guess I am. But it’s not because I’m some sort of genius. For example, when Dave asked me how I got started doing panels, I told him “I asked Hugh if I could.” It’s no harder than that. Hugh has said to me repeatedly that the best ideas for panels come from the attendees, not him. So if you felt something missing at this year’s conference, an idea unexplored, a trend overlooked, change that. Give Hugh your idea (Hugh at SXSW dot com) in the form of a panel idea, complete with perspective panelists. The worst he can do is say no and even that he does nicely.

6. If you can, experience SXSW with an old friend. That old friend is a little pool of normalcy and reflection in a week that feels like a year-long dream.

7. The more I reach out to new people, the richer my experience is. While I wouldn’t trade the time I spend year in and year out with my conference posse for anything, I can’t picture this year’s festival without Kevin and Kimberly from AOL and the old friends brought along by James and Jessa. They see SXSW with an openness that’s both infectuous and humbling. Sharing whatever wisdom I’ve gathered over the last five years makes me feel like I have a reason for coming here each spring other than hearing my own voice on panels and eating too much rich Texas cuisine. It makes me feel useful, instead of merely satiated.

8. South by Southwest is my New Year’s Day. I get into the whole champange and resolutions thing as much as the next person. But my year ends in certainty when I leave California for Austin and begins in earnest when I get home from the conference. It’s where I get inspired, recharged and like being born, ready to be the best me I can.

9. Someone has to be willing to sponsor the *nap room* proposed by Min Jung? C’mon.

10. Practice what you preach. I gave a whole seminar this year called “Where Do We Go From Here?” aiming to get attendees to channel the energy of SXSW to serve them throughout the year. I can’t stand the idea of how I feel at this conference being temporary. I want to feel this way most of the time. But I need to hold myself to those standards as well. I need to invest the energy that creativity and community deserve in order to reap the rewards. And not just in the weeks following the conference. In the summer, fall and winter, when it feels like forever until I get back to Austin. I can only come once a year. But I can try to be inspired, impassioned and alive as I can be the rest of the time.

I know I won’t do it perfectly. But I will try. And I’ll help anyone else who wants to as well.

So here we go. Future’s just ahead. You coming?

Previous Versions: 2003, 2002.

OUT NOW: Break The Frame: Conversations with Women Filmmakers
NOW AVAILABLE